AIYINGFrom AI Awareness to Accomplishment
Showing posts with label Future of Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Future of Education. Show all posts

Friday, November 13, 2026

PO: GenAI Is the Uber of Learning — From Current Capability to Accomplishment

AIYING | LATERAL AI THINKING | PO SERIES

PO: GenAI Is the Uber of Learning

Tell It Where You Are. Tell It Where You Want to Go.

What if learning began not with a syllabus, but with a pickup location and a destination?




1. The Provocation

Imagine opening Uber.

Before booking your ride, does Uber ask you to study the road network? Does it insist that you learn traffic rules, understand every junction, memorise alternative routes, and pass an examination in navigation?

No.

It asks two simple questions:

Where are you now?

Where do you want to go?

The system identifies a route, estimates the journey, and helps you reach your destination.

Now apply this idea to learning.

PO: Treat GenAI like Uber for learning.

Tell GenAI your current location in learning. Tell it your desired destination in capability. Let it help you discover and navigate the route.

2. The Hidden Assumption in Education

Traditional education commonly follows a predefined sequence:

Syllabus → Lessons → Practice → Examination → Application

The assumption is that learners must first acquire a body of knowledge before they can meaningfully apply it.

This approach has strengths. Foundational knowledge matters. Some subjects require careful sequencing, supervision, and extensive practice.

But does every learner need the same route? Must every learner begin at Chapter One? Must application always come last?

These are the assumptions worth challenging.

3. The PO Movement: From Curriculum to Navigation

Edward de Bono's lateral thinking approach uses provocation to move beyond established patterns of thinking. A PO statement is not a factual claim that must be defended. It is a deliberate stepping stone toward new possibilities.

Our provocation is:

PO: Learning is a journey booked by the learner, not a route prescribed entirely in advance.

The movement from this provocation produces an interesting idea:

Instead of organising learning primarily around content to be covered, organise it around capability to be achieved.

The syllabus becomes a flexible route rather than the starting point of every learning experience.

4. The Uber Model of AI Learning

Consider seven components of a learning journey.

📍 Pickup Location — Current State

What does the learner already know? What can they actually do? What tools and experience do they possess?

🏁 Destination — Desired Capability

What does the learner want to accomplish? Not merely what topic they want to study, but what they want to become capable of doing.

🗺️ Route — Personalised Learning Path

GenAI proposes a practical sequence of tasks, concepts, resources, and milestones appropriate to the learner's starting point.

🚀 Pickup — Begin with Application

The learner starts with a manageable real task. Learning begins through attempting something useful.

🔄 Navigation — Guidance and Feedback

GenAI explains concepts, answers questions, reviews attempts, and helps identify mistakes.

↪️ Rerouting — Adapt to Progress

If the learner struggles, the route changes. If the learner progresses quickly, unnecessary repetition can be reduced.

✅ Arrival — Demonstrated Accomplishment

The journey is complete only when the learner demonstrates the intended capability.

5. A Real Example: Becoming an AI Engineer

Consider a graduate who wants to enter AI engineering.

Pickup location:

I understand basic computing. I have used ChatGPT. I have very limited Python knowledge. I have never built an AI application.

Destination:

I want to build a working AI assistant that answers questions from documents, evaluates its answers, and can be demonstrated to an employer.

A conventional route might begin with a lengthy sequence of programming, mathematics, machine learning, and software engineering lessons.

The destination-driven approach begins differently.

  1. Attempt a simple document-question-answering prototype.
  2. Use GenAI to understand the generated code.
  3. Discover why document extraction and chunking matter.
  4. Learn about embeddings and retrieval when the application needs them.
  5. Introduce evaluation to check answer quality.
  6. Improve reliability, security, and user experience.
  7. Demonstrate and explain the completed application.

The learner does not avoid foundational concepts. The learner encounters them in the context of a meaningful destination.

The result is not guaranteed to be the shortest path for every learner. It is a route that can make learning more purposeful and responsive.

6. Apply Before Learn

This model connects directly to another lateral thinking provocation:

PO: Apply Before Learn.

The conventional sequence is:

Learn → Understand → Practise → Apply

The provocative alternative is:

Attempt → Discover Gaps → Learn → Improve → Apply Again

Here, application is not simply the final reward for completing a curriculum.

Application becomes a mechanism for discovering what needs to be learned.

GenAI can help by reducing some of the initial barriers to experimentation, providing explanations, and suggesting manageable next steps.

7. The Learner Is Not a Passive Passenger

Every analogy has limitations.

In an Uber ride, a passenger can reach the destination without understanding the journey.

Learning is different.

A learner cannot claim competence simply because an AI system produced a successful result.

The learner must understand, practise, evaluate, make decisions, and eventually perform independently.

Therefore, the analogy needs one important refinement:

GenAI navigates the learning journey. The learner must develop the capability to drive independently.

For professional, technical, medical, and other high-stakes capabilities, appropriate foundational preparation, qualified supervision, and independent assessment remain essential.

8. From Learning Management to Learning Navigation

Consider the implications for educational institutions.

Learning Management Systems traditionally help organise courses, distribute content, manage activities, and record assessment.

What if an AI-enabled learning environment added a navigation layer?

A student could declare:

Here is what I can do today. Here is what I want to accomplish. Here is how much time I have. Help me reach that capability.

The system could then recommend a route, provide practical assignments, diagnose gaps, and adjust the sequence using evidence of progress.

Teachers would remain important as mentors, designers of meaningful challenges, assessors of competence, and guides for responsible practice.

This suggests a possible evolution:

Learning Management → Learning Navigation

It is a design proposition, not a claim that existing AI systems can already perform every aspect reliably or autonomously.

9. Try It: Book Your First Learning Ride

Here is a reusable prompt for students, professionals, and lifelong learners.

AI LEARNING NAVIGATOR PROMPT

Act as my personal AI Learning Navigator. Treat my learning journey like booking an Uber ride.

My pickup location:
[What I know and can currently do]

My destination:
[The specific capability I want to demonstrate]

My constraints:
[Time, resources, experience, tools, and deadlines]

Your responsibilities:

  1. Verify my current capability through practical questions.
  2. Define clear evidence of successful arrival.
  3. Propose a realistic learning route.
  4. Begin with a small, meaningful application.
  5. Teach the necessary concepts along the way.
  6. Give me one actionable step at a time.
  7. Review my work and identify gaps.
  8. Reroute when needed.
  9. Test my independent capability before declaring arrival.

Start by asking for my pickup location and destination.

10. The AIYING Learning Experiment

This idea can be tested through a simple experiment.

Select two groups of learners with comparable starting capabilities and the same destination.

One group follows a structured, content-first learning path.

The other follows a destination-driven, AI-guided application-first path.

Compare their outcomes using:

  • Time to first working application.
  • Conceptual understanding.
  • Independent task performance.
  • Ability to explain and troubleshoot the solution.
  • Retention after several weeks.
  • Ability to transfer learning to a new problem.

The important question is not whether one group produces an impressive AI-generated output faster.

It is whether the learners develop genuine, transferable capability.

11. The Larger Possibility

If learning can be organised around pickup locations and destinations, several new possibilities emerge.

A college student may begin with a career destination. An employee may begin with a workplace challenge. A teacher may begin with a classroom improvement goal. An entrepreneur may begin with a business problem.

Their routes will differ because their starting points and desired outcomes differ.

GenAI could become a flexible navigation layer connecting current capability to desired capability.

This changes the central question from:

What course should I study?

To:

What do I want to become capable of doing, and what is my next useful step?

12. A New Provocation

The Uber analogy leads to a further challenge.

If GenAI can help create a personalised route, perhaps the curriculum need not always be fixed before the learner begins.

Perhaps it can emerge, within appropriate educational standards and safeguards, from the learner's destination, progress, and demonstrated needs.

PO: The curriculum is not the road. The curriculum is the route.

And that route can change as learning progresses.

13. From Awareness to Accomplishment

The AIYING approach to AI fluency emphasises moving beyond awareness toward meaningful application and accomplishment.

The learning navigator idea provides a practical way to think about that journey:

Know Your Starting Point

↓

Choose Your Destination

↓

Attempt Something Useful

↓

Learn, Practise, and Reroute

↓

Demonstrate Accomplishment

The ultimate objective is not simply to consume more learning content.

It is to become capable of doing something that matters.

Final Thought

For generations, learners have been told:

First complete the course. Then apply what you learned.

The GenAI age invites us to explore a different possibility:

Tell me where you are. Tell me where you want to go. Let us begin the journey through application.

The route can be discovered, tested, and improved along the way.

PO: GenAI Is the Uber of Learning.

Your current capability is the pickup location. Your desired capability is the destination. Application starts the journey. Learning happens along the way. Accomplishment confirms arrival.

AIYING | Choose Work That Matters

Join the Conversation

If you could book a learning journey today, what would be your pickup location and destination?

Share them in the comments. Perhaps your next learning experience should begin with that simple declaration.

AIYING — Lateral AI Thinking
Exploring the confluence of Edward de Bono's lateral thinking and the possibilities of generative AI.

#LateralAI #POThinking #AIYING #GenAI #AIFluency #FutureOfLearning #LearningInnovation #AIEngineering #PersonalizedLearning

Tuesday, June 23, 2026

🧠 Co-Learning with AI #1 What is Co-Learning with AI?

Stop Learning Alone. Start Thinking with AI.


🌍 Introduction: Learning Has Quietly Changed

For most of modern history, learning followed a simple pattern:

📚 Read → 🧠 Memorize → ✍️ Reproduce

It worked when knowledge was scarce.

But today, knowledge is everywhere.

The real challenge is no longer access to information—it is:

“How do I think with information?”

This is where a new learning paradigm emerges:

🤝 Co-Learning with AI

Not learning from AI.
Not learning about AI.

But learning with AI.


🧠 What is Co-Learning with AI?

Co-learning with AI is a dynamic thinking partnership between human curiosity and machine reasoning.

It works like this:

You bring direction.
AI expands possibilities.
You refine meaning.
AI sharpens understanding.
You apply insight.
AI accelerates iteration.

Instead of a one-way classroom model, learning becomes a living conversation loop.


🔄 The Core Idea: Learning as a Dialogue Loop

Co-learning is not a single interaction. It is a cycle:

🧭 Step 1: Curiosity Input (Human)

You start with something unclear or incomplete.

Example:

  • “Why do economies go into recession?”

  • “How does machine learning actually ‘learn’?”

  • “Why do people make irrational decisions?”


🤖 Step 2: Expansion (AI)

AI responds with:

  • explanations

  • frameworks

  • examples

  • breakdowns

But importantly—it doesn’t end the thinking.

It opens branches.


🧩 Step 3: Human Refinement

You respond with:

  • “Explain simpler”

  • “Give a real-world example”

  • “What’s the counterargument?”

  • “What breaks this model?”


🔍 Step 4: Deepening (AI)

AI adapts:

  • simplifies concepts

  • adds contrast cases

  • simulates scenarios

  • exposes assumptions


💡 Step 5: Understanding (Human)

You don’t just “know” the answer.

You:

  • see structure

  • understand relationships

  • recognize patterns

  • transfer learning to new problems


🧪 Example 1: Understanding Inflation (Traditional vs Co-Learning)

❌ Traditional Learning

You read:

Inflation = general increase in prices over time.

You memorize it.

Done.


🤝 Co-Learning with AI

You begin:

🧭 You:
“Why does inflation vary so much between countries?”

🤖 AI:
Explains:

  • monetary supply

  • demand shocks

  • supply chain effects

  • fiscal policy

🧩 You:
“Why does printing money sometimes NOT cause inflation immediately?”

🤖 AI:
Breaks down:

  • velocity of money

  • savings behavior

  • lag effects

💡 Result:
You now understand inflation as a system, not a definition.


🧪 Example 2: Learning Programming Logic

❌ Traditional Learning

  • Learn syntax

  • Memorize rules

  • Solve fixed problems


🤝 Co-Learning with AI

🧭 You:
“Why does this loop run infinitely?”

🤖 AI:
Explains logic flow

🧩 You:
“Can you simulate step-by-step execution?”

🤖 AI:
Walks through each iteration

🧩 You:
“What if input size becomes massive?”

🤖 AI:
Explains performance complexity

💡 Result:
You begin thinking like a system designer—not a coder.


🧠 The Hidden Transformation

Co-learning changes what learning even is:

Before:

Learning = storing information

Now:

Learning = building reasoning ability through interaction

You are no longer:

  • collecting facts

You are:

  • building mental models

  • testing assumptions

  • refining thinking patterns


🔍 The Real Power: Thinking Feedback Loops

The most powerful part of co-learning is not AI’s answers.

It is this loop:

❓ Question → 🧠 Expansion → 🔁 Challenge → 🔧 Refinement → 💡 Insight

Each cycle upgrades:

  • clarity

  • depth

  • reasoning speed

  • decision quality


🚀 Mini Illustration: The Co-Learning Shift

Traditional Mind:

“Tell me the answer.”

Co-Learning Mind:

“Help me explore why multiple answers exist—and when each one applies.”

That shift alone changes everything.


⚡ Where Co-Learning Becomes Powerful

It is especially transformative in:

  • 📊 Business decisions (understanding trade-offs)

  • 🧪 Science & research (testing hypotheses)

  • ✍️ Writing (structuring ideas)

  • 💼 Career growth (learning fast in new domains)

  • 🧠 Personal thinking (reducing bias and confusion)


🧭 Key Insight

Co-learning with AI is not about faster answers.
It is about building better thinking loops.


🌱 Final Thought

We are moving from:

“Learn information”
to
“Train intelligence through interaction”

And AI is not replacing learning.

It is rewiring how learning happens itself.


🤝 What Comes Next in the Series?

In Co-Learning with AI #2, we’ll break down:

🔄 The Co-Learning Loop

How your thinking actually evolves step-by-step when you interact with AI.


China's New Curriculum: What the Rest of the World Can Learn

A Quiet Educational Revolution with Global Implications

While much of the world is debating whether artificial intelligence will transform education, China has already begun redesigning significant parts of its education system around that assumption.

The headlines have focused on AI courses, robotics programs, and technology investments. However, the deeper story is not about adding AI to the curriculum. It is about redefining what universities are for in an age when information is abundant and intelligent systems are becoming part of everyday work.

Between 2021 and 2025, Chinese universities revoked or suspended approximately 12,200 undergraduate programs while introducing around 10,200 new programs. More than 30% of university programs underwent some form of adjustment according to data cited by China's Ministry of Education and state media. The changes were concentrated in programs with weak employment outcomes and increasing graduate oversupply. (Reddit)

Whether one agrees with China's approach or not, the scale of the reform raises an important question:

If AI is changing work, should universities continue teaching as if AI does not exist?


What Actually Changed?

Many reports outside China have incorrectly framed the reforms as a war against the humanities. The available evidence suggests something more nuanced.

China has not eliminated mathematics, science, economics, law, medicine, engineering, literature, philosophy, or history. Instead, universities have been restructuring programs that were experiencing declining demand, lower graduate employment rates, or significant overlap with other programs. (Reddit)

Among the areas most frequently reported as being reduced, merged, or suspended were:

  • Advertising

  • Animation

  • Photography

  • Broadcasting

  • Some journalism specializations

  • Translation programs

  • Some foreign language programs

  • Tourism management

  • Hotel management

  • Human resource management

  • Public administration

  • Marketing

  • Logistics management

At the same time, universities introduced or expanded programs in:

  • Artificial Intelligence

  • Data Science

  • Robotics

  • Integrated Circuits

  • Semiconductor Engineering

  • Intelligent Manufacturing

  • Renewable Energy

  • Biotechnology

  • Advanced Computing

  • Embodied Intelligence

  • Human-AI Systems

These changes align closely with China's broader strategic priorities in technology, manufacturing, healthcare, and national innovation. (Reuters)


The Most Important Change Is Not the Subjects

The real shift is philosophical.

For centuries, universities primarily served as institutions for knowledge transfer.

In the AI era, knowledge itself has become abundant.

Students can access information instantly through search engines, digital libraries, AI assistants, and specialized tools. The challenge is no longer obtaining information. The challenge is knowing what to do with it.

China's emerging educational model appears to be shifting from:

Teaching information
→ Building capability

Teaching subjects
→ Developing competencies

Preparing for jobs
→ Preparing for adaptation

This may be the most important educational experiment currently underway anywhere in the world.


AI Literacy Is Becoming a Foundational Skill

One of the clearest signals from China's reforms is the belief that AI literacy should become a universal capability.

In 2026, China's Ministry of Education and other government departments launched the "AI + Education Action Plan," aiming to build an AI literacy system across all stages of education and lifelong learning. The initiative seeks to ensure that AI understanding is not limited to computer scientists but becomes a basic competency for the broader population. (State Council of China)

Several universities have also introduced courses built around modern AI systems and large language models. Institutions including Zhejiang University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Renmin University, and Shenzhen University have incorporated AI-focused learning initiatives into their curricula. (Reuters)

The implication is profound:

AI literacy may soon be viewed similarly to digital literacy or basic computer literacy.

Not everyone needs to become an AI engineer.

But everyone may need to know how to think, work, learn, and create alongside AI systems.


Universities Are Being Aligned with National Strategy

Another lesson from China's reforms is the close alignment between education and long-term national priorities.

In 2025, leading universities including Peking University, Tsinghua University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and Renmin University announced enrollment expansions in AI, engineering, integrated circuits, biomedicine, healthcare, and other strategic disciplines. (Reuters)

The underlying question appears to be:

"What capabilities will the country need ten years from now?"

Educational investments are then aligned with those anticipated needs.

Many countries discuss workforce planning.

China is attempting curriculum planning at national scale.


What the Rest of the World Can Learn

Lesson 1: Employment Outcomes Matter

Universities cannot ignore changing labor markets.

When large numbers of graduates repeatedly struggle to find employment in specific fields, curriculum review becomes necessary.

This does not mean eliminating disciplines.

It means ensuring programs remain relevant, adaptive, and connected to emerging opportunities.


Lesson 2: AI Should Not Be Confined to Computer Science

AI is increasingly affecting:

  • Medicine

  • Agriculture

  • Manufacturing

  • Education

  • Finance

  • Law

  • Research

  • Government

Teaching AI only to computer science students may soon seem as outdated as teaching computers only to engineering students.


Lesson 3: Human Skills Become More Valuable, Not Less

Ironically, the rise of AI increases the importance of uniquely human capabilities:

  • Critical thinking

  • Judgment

  • Creativity

  • Ethics

  • Communication

  • Leadership

  • Collaboration

  • Systems thinking

The future is unlikely to belong to humans alone or AI alone.

It will belong to humans who know how to work effectively with AI.


Lesson 4: Curriculum Must Evolve Faster

Historically, university curricula changed slowly.

The AI era may require continuous curriculum adaptation.

The half-life of technical knowledge is shrinking.

Educational institutions may need mechanisms for annual review rather than decade-long cycles.


A Question Every University Must Now Answer

The central question raised by China's reforms is surprisingly simple:

What should students spend four years learning if AI can retrieve information instantly?

Possible answers include:

  • Problem solving

  • Critical thinking

  • Human-AI collaboration

  • Innovation

  • Systems thinking

  • Decision making

  • Ethical reasoning

  • Interdisciplinary knowledge

  • Real-world execution

These capabilities remain valuable regardless of which technologies emerge next.


Final Thoughts

China's curriculum reforms should not be viewed as a model to copy blindly.

Every country has different economic priorities, cultural traditions, labor markets, and educational goals.

However, the reforms force an important conversation.

The debate is no longer whether AI will affect education.

The debate is whether educational institutions will adapt quickly enough.

The most significant lesson may not be China's emphasis on AI.

It may be its willingness to ask a difficult question:

If the world changes, should education change too?

The countries that answer that question thoughtfully may shape the next generation of innovation, productivity, and human potential.


References

  1. Reuters. "Chinese Universities Launch DeepSeek Courses to Capitalise on AI Boom." February 2025. (Reuters)

  2. Reuters. "China's Top Universities Expand Enrolment to Beef Up Capabilities in AI, Strategic Areas." March 2025. (Reuters)

  3. China's State Council Information Office. "China Aims to Build an AI Literacy System." April 2026. (State Council of China)

  4. CGTN. "China's Top Universities Expand Enrollment for AI and Strategic Talent." March 2025. (CGTN News)

  5. Reuters. "China's Xi Calls for Self-Sufficiency in AI Development Amid U.S. Rivalry." April 2025. (Reuters)

  6. Ministry of Education data cited by Xinhua and reported in multiple news outlets regarding university program restructuring between 2021 and 2025. (Reddit)


Monday, June 22, 2026

AIYING Live #8 AI in Education

Reimagining How Humans Learn in the Age of Intelligent Systems

Introduction

Education has always evolved with technology.

From oral traditions to printed books, from classrooms to online platforms, each shift has expanded access to knowledge.

Now, artificial intelligence is redefining education once again.

But this time, the change is not just about access.

It is about personalization, interaction, and intelligence itself becoming part of the learning process.

AI is not replacing education.

It is reshaping how learning happens.

What AI in Education Means Today

AI in education refers to systems that support learning through:

  • Personalized tutoring

  • Adaptive learning paths

  • Instant explanations

  • Content generation

  • Skill practice support

  • Feedback and assessment assistance

Instead of a single learning path for everyone, AI enables dynamic learning tailored to individuals.

Why This Shift Matters

Traditional education systems are built on scale.

One teacher teaches many students.

One curriculum fits all.

One pace for everyone.

AI breaks this limitation.

It introduces:

  • Individual learning speeds

  • Context-aware explanations

  • On-demand support

  • Continuous feedback loops

This transforms learning from a structured system into an adaptive experience.

AI in Education Through the AIYING Lens

THINK

Learning begins with curiosity and clarity.

Students must define:

  • What they want to learn

  • Why it matters

  • What level they are at

  • What outcomes they expect

AI can help map learning paths, but direction must come from the learner.

ASK

AI becomes a powerful tutor when questions are structured well.

Examples:

  • Explain this concept simply

  • Give real-world examples

  • Break this topic into steps

  • Test my understanding

  • Compare related ideas

Better questions create deeper understanding.

JUDGE

Not all AI-generated explanations are perfect.

Learners must evaluate:

  • Accuracy

  • Clarity

  • Depth

  • Relevance

  • Consistency with trusted sources

Critical thinking remains essential in AI-assisted learning.

ACCOMPLISH

Learning is only meaningful when applied.

AI supports accomplishment by helping learners:

  • Practice skills

  • Build projects

  • Solve problems

  • Create outputs

  • Track progress

Knowledge becomes powerful only when used.

The Rise of AI Tutors

AI systems are becoming:

  • Always available

  • Highly adaptive

  • Patient and repetitive

  • Multimodal in explanation

  • Personalized in approach

This makes them powerful learning companions, especially when combined with human guidance.

Challenges in AI-Driven Education

Despite its potential, AI introduces challenges:

  • Over-reliance on answers

  • Reduced deep thinking if misused

  • Quality variation in outputs

  • Need for digital literacy

  • Evaluation of correctness

The role of the learner becomes more important, not less.

The Future of Learning

Education is shifting toward:

  • Lifelong learning

  • Skill-based learning

  • Self-directed learning

  • AI-supported learning ecosystems

In this future, classrooms are no longer the only learning environment.

Learning becomes continuous and everywhere.

Final Thought

AI in education is not about replacing teachers or institutions.

It is about enhancing how humans learn, think, and grow.

The most effective learners will not be those who depend on AI completely.

They will be those who collaborate with AI effectively.

And that collaboration is guided by a simple system:

Think → Ask → Judge → Accomplish

Because in the age of AI, learning is no longer about memorizing information.

It is about building intelligence.


AIYING Live #8

Human Intelligence × Artificial Intelligence

Think → Ask → Judge → Accomplish

Plant Ideas. Grow Impact.

https://dastikop.blogspot.com

Accomplish with AI

Powered by Blogger.

Featured post

AI Engineering Hands-On Lab #001 — Build an AI Answer Reliability Test Bench Without Code

AIYING | Daily 24 — Post 009 AI Engineering Hands-On Lab #001 Build an AI Answer Reliability Test Bench — Without Writing Code Lea...

Search This Blog

List of blogs

Search This Blog

About

Translate

Instant Stories

Read in Your Language

Test

share this

ShareThis

Popular Posts