AIYINGFrom AI Awareness to Accomplishment
Showing posts with label Education Innovation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Education Innovation. Show all posts

Friday, November 13, 2026

PO: Uber Gives Mobility. GenAI Gives Learnability — The Rise of Learnability as a Service

AIYING | LATERAL AI THINKING | PO SERIES

PO: Uber Gives Mobility. GenAI Gives Learnability.

From Mobility as a Service to Learnability as a Service

What if GenAI's most important contribution to education is not generating answers, but making the ability to learn more accessible?


1. The Provocation

Uber did not invent transportation.

It changed how people access transportation.

You do not necessarily need to own a car, employ a driver, or know the roads to arrange a journey.

You specify your current location and destination. A ride-hailing service connects you with transportation.

Now consider GenAI.

GenAI did not invent learning.

But could it fundamentally change how people access the means to learn?

PO: Uber Gives Mobility.
GenAI Gives Learnability.

This is a deliberate lateral thinking provocation. It invites us to explore possibilities rather than claim that the analogy is literally or universally true.

2. Mobility and Learnability

Mobility is the ability to move from one place to another.

Learnability, in this discussion, means the practical ability to acquire and develop new knowledge, skills, and capabilities.

The two share an interesting structural similarity.

Uber GenAI Learning
Mobility Learnability
Pickup location Current capability
Destination Desired capability
Route planning Learning pathway
Navigation AI guidance
Rerouting Adaptive learning
Arrival Demonstrated accomplishment

Uber helps people move between physical locations.

GenAI can help people move between states of capability.

Mobility moves people between places.
Learnability moves people between capabilities.

3. The Hidden Assumption

Learning has traditionally been organised around institutions, courses, teachers, textbooks, and predefined curricula.

These remain valuable.

But an implicit assumption often persists:

To develop a capability, you must first enter a prescribed learning process.

The process may require completing lessons, following a syllabus, and passing assessments before applying the knowledge.

What if we reversed the starting point?

Instead of asking:

Which course should I study?

We ask:

What do I want to become capable of doing?

And then:

Where am I now? What is the next useful step? What must I learn to accomplish it?

4. The Lateral Thinking Movement

Edward de Bono's lateral thinking approach uses provocation and movement to escape established patterns and generate alternative possibilities.

Our PO statement is:

PO: GenAI gives learnability.

We can move from this provocation in several ways.

Movement 1: Extract the Principle

Uber separates access to transportation from the necessity of owning a vehicle.

Can GenAI help separate access to learning support from the necessity of enrolling in a complete formal course?

A learner may still need structured education, but could begin exploring a capability immediately.

Movement 2: Focus on the Difference

Transportation moves the passenger. Learning must transform the learner.

An Uber passenger can arrive without knowing the route. A learner cannot demonstrate competence merely because AI completed the task.

Therefore, an AI learning service must provide more than answers or finished outputs.

It must support practice, understanding, feedback, reflection, and independent performance.

Movement 3: Generate a New Possibility

What if learnability itself could be offered as an accessible, personalised service?

Not a catalogue of courses. Not merely a chatbot answering questions.

A system organised around helping people move from current capability to desired capability.

5. Learnability as a Service (LaaS)

We can call this emerging possibility:

Learnability as a Service

LaaS

An AI-supported learning model that helps individuals identify their current capabilities, define desired outcomes, follow adaptive learning pathways, practise relevant tasks, and demonstrate new capabilities.

This is a proposed conceptual model, not a claim that all existing GenAI tools already deliver a complete, validated learning service.

A useful LaaS system would include seven functions.

  1. Locate: Establish what the learner already knows and can independently do.
  2. Specify: Define the desired capability and observable evidence of success.
  3. Navigate: Recommend a realistic learning route.
  4. Activate: Begin with a meaningful, manageable application.
  5. Support: Provide explanations, practice opportunities, and feedback.
  6. Reroute: Adapt based on errors, progress, and changing requirements.
  7. Validate: Test whether the learner can demonstrate the capability independently.

The final function is essential.

Generating a successful answer is not the same as developing the capability to produce, evaluate, and improve that answer.

6. Apply Before Learn

This proposition connects to another AIYING lateral thinking provocation:

PO: Apply Before Learn.

The conventional sequence is:

Learn → Practise → Apply

The provocative alternative is:

Attempt → Discover → Learn → Improve → Accomplish

The learner attempts something useful.

The attempt reveals gaps.

Those gaps create questions.

Questions create a purpose for learning.

GenAI helps the learner investigate, practise, and improve.

In this model, learning is not eliminated. It is activated by the pursuit of a meaningful outcome.

7. Example: The Aspiring AI Engineer

Consider a graduate who wants to become an AI application developer.

Current Capability

I know basic computing. I have used ChatGPT. I have very little programming experience.

Desired Capability

I want to build an AI assistant that answers questions from documents, checks its responses, and can be demonstrated to an employer.

An AI learning navigator might begin with a small prototype rather than an extensive sequence of lectures.

The learner attempts the application with AI assistance.

During development, the learner encounters new concepts:

  • Python and APIs
  • Document processing
  • Chunking and embeddings
  • Retrieval-augmented generation
  • Evaluation and hallucination
  • Security and responsible AI
  • Testing and deployment

Each concept becomes meaningful because it contributes to the desired accomplishment.

The learning navigator helps determine which concepts require immediate attention and which can be studied later.

At the destination, the learner should be able to explain the application, troubleshoot failures, evaluate outputs, and complete a comparable task independently.

The objective is capability, not merely an AI-generated project.

8. What Could Change in Education?

If learnability becomes more accessible through GenAI, educational institutions could experiment with new models.

From Courses to Capability Journeys

Courses remain useful, but learners may also follow pathways organised around specific accomplishments.

From Standard Routes to Adaptive Routes

Learners with different starting capabilities may receive different sequences of tasks, explanations, and practice.

From Content Completion to Capability Evidence

Progress could be measured not only by lessons completed but by what learners can independently demonstrate.

From One-Time Education to Continuous Learnability

Professionals could repeatedly define new destinations as technologies, jobs, and workplace requirements change.

From AI Answering to AI Guiding

AI systems could be designed to ask questions, identify misconceptions, recommend exercises, and encourage independent reasoning, rather than immediately completing every task.

9. A Necessary Caution

The analogy is powerful, but it has limits.

Uber provides a transportation service. It does not necessarily develop the passenger's ability to drive.

GenAI, by contrast, must help develop the learner's own capability.

If learners become dependent on AI for every decision, explanation, and action, the system may increase task completion without increasing learnability.

Therefore, a credible LaaS model must include independent practice, assessment, feedback quality, and safeguards against incorrect or misleading AI guidance.

Some disciplines also require formal instruction, supervised experience, professional accreditation, and rigorous foundational preparation.

Learnability as a Service should complement these requirements rather than bypass them.

10. An AIYING Experiment

Can we test the idea?

Consider a small experiment with learners who have comparable starting skills.

Give both groups the same capability goal.

One group follows a conventional content-first pathway.

The other uses an AI-guided, application-first pathway.

Compare:

  • Time to first useful application
  • Conceptual understanding
  • Ability to work independently
  • Retention after several weeks
  • Ability to transfer skills to new problems
  • Confidence and motivation

The results may reveal where destination-driven learning works well, where it needs additional structure, and where traditional instruction remains essential.

That would move the provocation from an interesting idea toward an evidence-informed educational practice.

11. Try Learnability as a Service

Here is a practical prompt you can use with a GenAI assistant.

MY LEARNABILITY NAVIGATOR

Act as my AI Learning Navigator.

Treat my learning journey like an Uber ride, but remember that your goal is to help me develop independent capability.

Pickup location:
[What I currently know and can do]

Destination:
[What I want to become capable of doing]

Constraints:
[Time, tools, resources, and deadlines]

Please:

  1. Assess my starting capability.
  2. Clarify my desired outcome.
  3. Define measurable arrival criteria.
  4. Recommend a practical route.
  5. Start with one small application.
  6. Explain concepts when they become necessary.
  7. Review my attempts and identify mistakes.
  8. Adapt the route as I progress.
  9. Test my independent capability.
  10. Recommend the next destination.

Do not simply complete tasks for me. Help me become capable of completing and evaluating them myself.

12. The Larger Possibility

Mobility changed how people access places.

Could learnability change how people access opportunities?

A graduate seeking employment, an employee adapting to new technology, an entrepreneur developing a product, or a teacher exploring new methods may all have different learning destinations.

GenAI could help each person discover a practical route from their current capability to a desired outcome.

This leads to a larger proposition:

The next important innovation in AI education may not be more content generation. It may be better capability navigation.

The challenge is to design systems that make people more capable, not merely more dependent on AI assistance.

13. The Next PO

The idea of Learnability as a Service opens another provocative possibility.

PO: The learner owns the destination. The curriculum follows.

What if the learner's desired accomplishment became the organising principle, and the curriculum became a dynamically constructed route?

What would happen to course design, assessment, teaching, certification, and lifelong learning?

These questions deserve exploration.

Final Thought

Uber gives people access to mobility.

GenAI offers the possibility of making learnability more accessible.

The distinction matters.

The goal is not simply to transport a learner to an answer.

The goal is to develop the learner's ability to reach new destinations with increasing independence.

PO: Uber Gives Mobility.
GenAI Gives Learnability.

Mobility moves people between places.
Learnability moves people between capabilities.

Tell GenAI where you are.
Tell it where you want to go.
Begin with application.
Learn along the way.
Demonstrate your accomplishment.

AIYING | Choose Work That Matters

Join the Conversation

If GenAI could help you navigate one learning journey today, what would your destination be?

Would you choose a new technical skill, a professional capability, or something you have always wanted to create?

Share your pickup location and destination.

Perhaps the future of learning begins with those two simple questions.

AIYING | Lateral AI Thinking
Exploring the confluence of lateral thinking, generative AI, and human capability.

#LateralAI #POThinking #AIYING #GenAI #Learnability #AIFluency #FutureOfLearning #EducationInnovation #LifelongLearning

Tuesday, June 23, 2026

China's New Curriculum: What the Rest of the World Can Learn

A Quiet Educational Revolution with Global Implications

While much of the world is debating whether artificial intelligence will transform education, China has already begun redesigning significant parts of its education system around that assumption.

The headlines have focused on AI courses, robotics programs, and technology investments. However, the deeper story is not about adding AI to the curriculum. It is about redefining what universities are for in an age when information is abundant and intelligent systems are becoming part of everyday work.

Between 2021 and 2025, Chinese universities revoked or suspended approximately 12,200 undergraduate programs while introducing around 10,200 new programs. More than 30% of university programs underwent some form of adjustment according to data cited by China's Ministry of Education and state media. The changes were concentrated in programs with weak employment outcomes and increasing graduate oversupply. (Reddit)

Whether one agrees with China's approach or not, the scale of the reform raises an important question:

If AI is changing work, should universities continue teaching as if AI does not exist?


What Actually Changed?

Many reports outside China have incorrectly framed the reforms as a war against the humanities. The available evidence suggests something more nuanced.

China has not eliminated mathematics, science, economics, law, medicine, engineering, literature, philosophy, or history. Instead, universities have been restructuring programs that were experiencing declining demand, lower graduate employment rates, or significant overlap with other programs. (Reddit)

Among the areas most frequently reported as being reduced, merged, or suspended were:

  • Advertising

  • Animation

  • Photography

  • Broadcasting

  • Some journalism specializations

  • Translation programs

  • Some foreign language programs

  • Tourism management

  • Hotel management

  • Human resource management

  • Public administration

  • Marketing

  • Logistics management

At the same time, universities introduced or expanded programs in:

  • Artificial Intelligence

  • Data Science

  • Robotics

  • Integrated Circuits

  • Semiconductor Engineering

  • Intelligent Manufacturing

  • Renewable Energy

  • Biotechnology

  • Advanced Computing

  • Embodied Intelligence

  • Human-AI Systems

These changes align closely with China's broader strategic priorities in technology, manufacturing, healthcare, and national innovation. (Reuters)


The Most Important Change Is Not the Subjects

The real shift is philosophical.

For centuries, universities primarily served as institutions for knowledge transfer.

In the AI era, knowledge itself has become abundant.

Students can access information instantly through search engines, digital libraries, AI assistants, and specialized tools. The challenge is no longer obtaining information. The challenge is knowing what to do with it.

China's emerging educational model appears to be shifting from:

Teaching information
→ Building capability

Teaching subjects
→ Developing competencies

Preparing for jobs
→ Preparing for adaptation

This may be the most important educational experiment currently underway anywhere in the world.


AI Literacy Is Becoming a Foundational Skill

One of the clearest signals from China's reforms is the belief that AI literacy should become a universal capability.

In 2026, China's Ministry of Education and other government departments launched the "AI + Education Action Plan," aiming to build an AI literacy system across all stages of education and lifelong learning. The initiative seeks to ensure that AI understanding is not limited to computer scientists but becomes a basic competency for the broader population. (State Council of China)

Several universities have also introduced courses built around modern AI systems and large language models. Institutions including Zhejiang University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Renmin University, and Shenzhen University have incorporated AI-focused learning initiatives into their curricula. (Reuters)

The implication is profound:

AI literacy may soon be viewed similarly to digital literacy or basic computer literacy.

Not everyone needs to become an AI engineer.

But everyone may need to know how to think, work, learn, and create alongside AI systems.


Universities Are Being Aligned with National Strategy

Another lesson from China's reforms is the close alignment between education and long-term national priorities.

In 2025, leading universities including Peking University, Tsinghua University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and Renmin University announced enrollment expansions in AI, engineering, integrated circuits, biomedicine, healthcare, and other strategic disciplines. (Reuters)

The underlying question appears to be:

"What capabilities will the country need ten years from now?"

Educational investments are then aligned with those anticipated needs.

Many countries discuss workforce planning.

China is attempting curriculum planning at national scale.


What the Rest of the World Can Learn

Lesson 1: Employment Outcomes Matter

Universities cannot ignore changing labor markets.

When large numbers of graduates repeatedly struggle to find employment in specific fields, curriculum review becomes necessary.

This does not mean eliminating disciplines.

It means ensuring programs remain relevant, adaptive, and connected to emerging opportunities.


Lesson 2: AI Should Not Be Confined to Computer Science

AI is increasingly affecting:

  • Medicine

  • Agriculture

  • Manufacturing

  • Education

  • Finance

  • Law

  • Research

  • Government

Teaching AI only to computer science students may soon seem as outdated as teaching computers only to engineering students.


Lesson 3: Human Skills Become More Valuable, Not Less

Ironically, the rise of AI increases the importance of uniquely human capabilities:

  • Critical thinking

  • Judgment

  • Creativity

  • Ethics

  • Communication

  • Leadership

  • Collaboration

  • Systems thinking

The future is unlikely to belong to humans alone or AI alone.

It will belong to humans who know how to work effectively with AI.


Lesson 4: Curriculum Must Evolve Faster

Historically, university curricula changed slowly.

The AI era may require continuous curriculum adaptation.

The half-life of technical knowledge is shrinking.

Educational institutions may need mechanisms for annual review rather than decade-long cycles.


A Question Every University Must Now Answer

The central question raised by China's reforms is surprisingly simple:

What should students spend four years learning if AI can retrieve information instantly?

Possible answers include:

  • Problem solving

  • Critical thinking

  • Human-AI collaboration

  • Innovation

  • Systems thinking

  • Decision making

  • Ethical reasoning

  • Interdisciplinary knowledge

  • Real-world execution

These capabilities remain valuable regardless of which technologies emerge next.


Final Thoughts

China's curriculum reforms should not be viewed as a model to copy blindly.

Every country has different economic priorities, cultural traditions, labor markets, and educational goals.

However, the reforms force an important conversation.

The debate is no longer whether AI will affect education.

The debate is whether educational institutions will adapt quickly enough.

The most significant lesson may not be China's emphasis on AI.

It may be its willingness to ask a difficult question:

If the world changes, should education change too?

The countries that answer that question thoughtfully may shape the next generation of innovation, productivity, and human potential.


References

  1. Reuters. "Chinese Universities Launch DeepSeek Courses to Capitalise on AI Boom." February 2025. (Reuters)

  2. Reuters. "China's Top Universities Expand Enrolment to Beef Up Capabilities in AI, Strategic Areas." March 2025. (Reuters)

  3. China's State Council Information Office. "China Aims to Build an AI Literacy System." April 2026. (State Council of China)

  4. CGTN. "China's Top Universities Expand Enrollment for AI and Strategic Talent." March 2025. (CGTN News)

  5. Reuters. "China's Xi Calls for Self-Sufficiency in AI Development Amid U.S. Rivalry." April 2025. (Reuters)

  6. Ministry of Education data cited by Xinhua and reported in multiple news outlets regarding university program restructuring between 2021 and 2025. (Reddit)


Accomplish with AI

Powered by Blogger.

Featured post

AI Engineering Hands-On Lab #001 — Build an AI Answer Reliability Test Bench Without Code

AIYING | Daily 24 — Post 009 AI Engineering Hands-On Lab #001 Build an AI Answer Reliability Test Bench — Without Writing Code Lea...

Search This Blog

List of blogs

Search This Blog

About

Translate

Instant Stories

Read in Your Language

Test

share this

ShareThis

Popular Posts